Drawing for DREAMNET

USPTO serial 75099905

DREAMNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DREAMNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry D. Johnson

LARRY D JOHNSON JOHNSON & STAINBROOK3558 ROUND BARN BLVD STE 203SANTA ROSA, CA 95403-0921UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROMOTING THE MUSIC AND VIDEO GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY ARRANGING FOR THE SCHEDULING OR PROGRAMMING OF ADVERTISEMENTS ON WEBSITES ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKABANDONEDAug 24, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 19, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 3, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance