USPTO serial 75100059
CHC TRACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHC TRACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain Lakes, NJ
Mountain Lakes, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
JEFFREY BARTON CAHN SILLS CUMMIS RADIN TISCHMAN EPSTEIN & GRONE RIVERFRONT PLZNEWARK, NJ 07102-5400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer consultation services relating to production system maintenance in commercial and manufacturing settings and enhancement of computer software applications, namely, computer monitoring and measuring of contract engagement activities and performance, determining resource utilization, and implementation/enforcement of standard practices and procedures, and providing status reports thereon | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |