Drawing for NEW YORK WATER

USPTO serial 75100086

NEW YORK WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRESSEY, MONTIA GIVENS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW YORK WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Evelyn Sommer

EVELYN SOMMER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM919 THIRD AVEYNY, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032bottled drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 26, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 23, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 15, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance