USPTO serial 75100174
RETAILINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RETAILINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER A. ALBERT
JENNIFER A ALBERT ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment for transmitting and receiving digital and analog signals over and integrated services digital network, namely, used for voice and data transmissions in telecommunications applications such as high speed data send/receipt, multiple voice connections, global computer network access, small, office, and retail environments | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |