Drawing for TACKLINE COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75100721

TACKLINE COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TACKLINE COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN L BEARD

JOHN L BEARD MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in providing integrated office applications that merge customer account information, word processing, calendars, spreadsheets, and E-mail that may be downloaded from a global computer networkACTIVE—
036providing financial information via computer for integrating investment information and transactions; providing financial news via computerACTIVE—
038electronic data transmission and mail services; providing electronic delivery of stocks, bonds, mutual funds, annuities, insurance products and programs for credit card, mortgage, trust, pension and savings plansACTIVE—
041providing continuing education services via electronic transmission in the nature of instruction, classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of finance and investmentACTIVE—
042providing integrated office systems in the nature of an interactive computer database which can merge customer account information, word processing, calendars, spreadsheets, and E-mailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 13, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 8, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 9, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 23, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance