USPTO serial 75101261
SITIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 2002
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SITIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Amagasaki, Hyogo 660, JP
Amagasaki, Hyogo 660, JP
Amagasaki, Hyogo 660, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. JAY HINES
P JAY HINES OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER ET AL.1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | industrial chemicals; chlorides; [ tetracholorides ] * tetrachlorides *; silicon, dioxide titanium for industrial purposes; inorganic halides, metallic oxides | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | titanium; ingot of common metals; alloys of common metals; ferrotitanium | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | semiconductors; wafers; semiconductor silicon materials; silicon materials for photovoltaic cells | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUMITOMO SITIX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SUMITOMO SITIX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SUMITOMO SITIX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SITIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |