USPTO serial 75101388
SAVORY FARE GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 1998
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAVORY FARE GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dover, DE
Dover, DE
WINSTON SALEM, NC
CINCINNATI, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur J. DeBaugh
ARTHUR J DEBAUGH470 HANES MILL RDWINSTON SALEM, NC 27105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cooked beef, chicken, turkey or pork sausage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Saramar Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Saramar Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SARA LEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SARA LEE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SAVORY FARE GOURMET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |