USPTO serial 75102948
BRITE BOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITE BOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold E. Meier
HAROLD E MEIER GARDERE & WYNNE, LLP3000 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | liquid metal polish | ABANDONED | May 20, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 14, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |