USPTO serial 75103278
VISUAL LOGIC CONTROLLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2701514Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2003
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VISUAL LOGIC CONTROLLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, MI
MIDDLETOWN, PA
ANN ARBOR, MI
MIDDLETOWN, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Brock
Christopher M. Brock Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.PO Box 828Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the design of control programs for personal computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steeplechase Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Steeplechase Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX CONTACT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENTIVITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Contact Services, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISUAL LOGIC CONTROLLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 8, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |