USPTO serial 75103295
FOX KIDS INTERACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOX KIDS INTERACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAPHNE GRONICH
DAPHNE GRONICH FOX INCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTP O BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing on-line information in the field of entertainment relating to motion picture films, television shows, children's topics, sports and games transmitted via a global computer network; production of computer software featuring education and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FOX KIDS INTERACTIVE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |