Drawing for A VERY DIFFERENT LONG DISTANCE COMPANY

USPTO serial 75103414

A VERY DIFFERENT LONG DISTANCE COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A VERY DIFFERENT LONG DISTANCE COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nelson Blitz

NELSON BLITZ ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC9302 LEE HWY STE 1100FAIRFAX, VA 22031UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038long distance telecommunication services, namely, long distance telephone services, electronic transmission of data and information and providing and implementation of voice and data lines and providing telecommunications connections to a global computer information networkABANDONEDMay 31, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance