USPTO serial 75103414
A VERY DIFFERENT LONG DISTANCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A VERY DIFFERENT LONG DISTANCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nelson Blitz
NELSON BLITZ ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC9302 LEE HWY STE 1100FAIRFAX, VA 22031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | long distance telecommunication services, namely, long distance telephone services, electronic transmission of data and information and providing and implementation of voice and data lines and providing telecommunications connections to a global computer information network | ABANDONED | May 31, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |