USPTO serial 75103556
DUAL ACTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 1998
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUAL ACTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
CLINTON, CT
CLINTON, CT
Greenwich, CT
Greenwich, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH LEONARD
KENNETH LEONARD UNILEVER LAW DEPT33 BENEDICT PLGREENWICH, CT 06830UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | petroleum jelly cream for cosmetic purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHESEBROUGH-POND'S INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UNILEVER SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UNILEVER SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Conopco, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Conopco, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DUAL ACTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |