USPTO serial 75103676
STEAM MATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEAM MATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL E BAIR
JOEL E BAIR RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER & MCGARRY171 MONROE NW STE 600GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electrical cleaning devices, namely, carpet and upholstery cleaning extractors and vacuum cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |