USPTO serial 75104086
DATASTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATASTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley Sacks
STANLEY SACKS WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for assessment of financial performance, financial status and financial viability of companies and of corporations, automatic telephone dialers, computer memories, blank floppy disks for computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | pamphlets, manuals, brochures, newsletters, and books, all relating to finance, investments, stock/bond markets, company information and insurance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Datastream International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Datastream International Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DATASTREAM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |