USPTO serial 75104593
DYNAMIC SHAPEROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2246755Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 1999
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNAMIC SHAPEROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92400 Courbevone, FR
95864 CERGY-PONTOISE CEDEX, FR
CERGY-PONTOISE CEDEX, FR
95863 CERGY PONTOISE CEDEX, FR
92400 Courbevone, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
NEIL F GREENBLUM AND BRUCE H BERNSTEIN GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20171UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | rolling mill parts and components, namely, a back up roll for supporting the loads applied on a working roll during rolling; hydraulic high pressure power station in the nature of a variable camber rolling mill rolls; and back up roll pads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 1998 |
| 009 | microprocessor for the automatic shape flatness and/or profile control for rolling mill; automatic servo valves, namely, servo valves for pressure and/or position control of back up roll pads in back up roll machines; actuators in the nature of electrical controllers for use with variable camber rolling mill rolls to control and modify the shape flatness and/or the profile of a strip during its rolling; software for use with variable camber rolling mill rolls to control the shape flatness and profile; and profile and flatness actuator in the nature of an electrical controller for rolling mill | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KVAERNER METALS CLECIM
- Other trademarks owned by KVAERNER CLECIM
- Other trademarks owned by CLECIM, DAVY
- Other trademarks owned by CLECIM (S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by KVAERNER METALS CLECIM
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC SHAPEROLL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |