USPTO serial 75105129
CRACOVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRACOVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KRAKOWSKIE PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO PRZEMYSLU SPIRYTUSOWEGO I DROZDZOWEGO "POLMOS"
31-553 Krakow, PL
Other trademarks owned by KRAKOWSKIE PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO PRZEMYSLU SPIRYTUSOWEGO I DROZDZOWEGO "POLMOS"
DESTYLERNIA "POLMOS" W KRAKOWIE S.A.
Krakow, PL
Other trademarks owned by DESTYLERNIA "POLMOS" W KRAKOWIE S.A.
DESTYLERNIA "POLMOS" W KRAKOWIE S.A.
Krakow, PL
Other trademarks owned by DESTYLERNIA "POLMOS" W KRAKOWIE S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRAKOWSKIE PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO PRZEMYSLU SPIRYTUSOWEGO I DROZDZOWEGO "POLMOS"
- Other trademarks owned by DESTYLERNIA "POLMOS" W KRAKOWIE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by DESTYLERNIA "POLMOS" W KRAKOWIE S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CRACOVIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 27, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |