USPTO serial 75105514
THERAPEUTIC WINDOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERAPEUTIC WINDOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A. CIGELNIK
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK ORUM & ROTH53 W JACKSON BLVD STE 1616CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for medical diagnosis and treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |