USPTO serial 75105873
PYRAMID SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PYRAMID SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL R SHEMKE
214 S MAIN ST STE 206ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | procurement of electronic audio and/or visual display systems, which allow an individual to view and/or manipulate data displayed on remote computer screens or two dimensional and three dimensional images which are embodied in data either transmitted to such systems from remote locations or recorded on magnetic or digital tapes or discs, for others | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1989 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of electronic audio and/or visual display systems, which allow an individual to view and/or manipulate data displayed on remote computer screens or two dimensional and three dimensional images which are embodied in data either transmitted to such systems from remote locations or recorded on magnetic or digital tapes or discs | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1989 |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data via electronic audio and/or visual display systems, which allow an individual to view and/or manipulate data displayed on remote computer screens or two dimensional and three dimensional images which are embodied in data either transmitted to such systems from remote locations or recorded on magnetic or digital tapes or discs | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1989 |
| 042 | design of electronic audio and/or visual display systems, which allow an individual to view and/or manipulate data displayed on remote computer screens or two dimensional and three dimensional images which are embodied in data either transmitted to such systems from remote locations or recorded on magnetic or digital tapes or discs, and consultations related thereto | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pyramid Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pyramid Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PYRAMID SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |