Drawing for REFLEX

USPTO serial 75106002

REFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Goldman

STEPHEN B GOLDMAN LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERGKRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017foot orthotic materials, namely, synthetic foam, for use in the construction of foot orthotic devices sold to manufacturers thereofABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 14, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 14, 1999OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 1997OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 2, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance