USPTO serial 75106384
THE SOHO STORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SOHO STORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY, BAUERSFELD & LOWRY6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store services featuring office and home-office automation product sales, installation and integration, consisting of, but not limited to, lighting, heating, security sensors and monitoring, energy-conservation, audio and video; business equipment and systems sales, installation and integration, including telephony, voice recornition systems, software customization, local area and wide area networking, internet and intranet planning and implementation, video conferencing and data collaboration, desktop publishing and presentation products, data acquisition and retrieval, paperless office systems, ergonomic space planning, layout, design and installation, mobile networking systems integration, wireless communications, power systems and accessories; consulting services on starting a new business venture, business plans; graphic design of letterhead, business cards, brochures, advertising materials; training, instructional videos, technical support, equipment repair; books and periodicals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |