USPTO serial 75107202
STOCK MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STOCK MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford S. Goldfarb
CLIFFORD S GOLDFARB FARANO GREENSTE 110022 ST CLAIR AVE ETORONTO, ON M4T 2Z6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | public relations for corporate clients; consulting services in the field of corporate public relations; advertising agency services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1999 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |