Drawing for SWEEPY

USPTO serial 75107272

SWEEPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAXLEY,ANDREW P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWEEPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne M.J. Boisineau

Lynne M.J. Boisineau McDermott Will & Emery LLP18191 Von Karman Ave.Suite 500Irvine, CA 92612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007swimming pool and pond cleaning machines; water pumps for use in swimming pools and pondsACTIVE—
009electric robots for cleaning swimming pools and ponds, pumps for dispensing metered doses of water purification chemicals in swimming pools and ponds, oxygen and chlorine level monitors for swimming pools and pondsACTIVE—
011water filtering units, water purification units, water treatment units, chlorinating units, oxygenating units, and ozoning units for ponds and swimming pools; cartridges and filters being parts of water filtering units for swimming pools and ponds; plumbing valves for use in swimming pools and ponds; water fountains and decorative water fountains, and spasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 31, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 5, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 4, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 9, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 26, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 23, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance