USPTO serial 75107289
CULINARY ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 1999
- Examiner
- PRESSEY, MONTIA GIVENS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CULINARY ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
QUEST INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS AND FRAGRANCES, INC.
MOUNT OLIVE, NJ
Other trademarks owned by QUEST INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS AND FRAGRANCES, INC.
Bridgewater, NJ
Bridgewater, NJ
Bridgewater, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS S BAKER, JR.
THOMAS S BAKER JR THOMAS S BAKER, JR, ATTORNEY AT LAW LLC1371 W 3RD AVECOLUMBUS, OH 43212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dried fruits and vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUEST INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS AND FRAGRANCES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INDOPCO, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INDOPCO, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INDOPCO, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CULINARY ADVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |