USPTO serial 75107543
INDIVIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIVIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony H. Handal
ANTHONY H HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, interactive assembly of customized graphic presentations and presentation of the same over communications systems; interactive assembly, using a computer, of customized audio and graphic presentations and providing the same over publicly accessible electronic data transmission systems; assembly, using a computer, of customized graphic presentations from a library of graphic images and image sequences and presentation of the same over publicly accessible electronic data transmission systems; computer services, namely, development of interactive multimedia and management software which enables companies and individuals including, without limitation, interactive media companies, interactive service providers, traditional media companies, marketing organizations, cable and television network operators, and telecom companies including regional long-distance carriers to develop, maintain, and present customized multimedia presentations that are personalized to individual end-user profiles; computer services, namely, development of interactive multimedia presentations and management software which enable companies and individuals including, without limitation, interactive media companies, interactive service providers, traditional media companies, marketing organizations, cable and television network operators, and telecom companies including regional long-distance carriers to develop and maintain multimedia presentations that are personalized to individual end-user profiles, based on history of end-user use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |