USPTO serial 75107694
ESPECIALLY HAIR A FACIAL FOR THE HAIR THE SIGN ENHANCE AN ALL NATURAL DAILY MOISTURIZER PRODUCTS IN THE SPIRIT OF COSMETOLOGIST CATHERINE SNEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESPECIALLY HAIR A FACIAL FOR THE HAIR THE SIGN ENHANCE AN ALL NATURAL DAILY MOISTURIZER PRODUCTS IN THE SPIRIT OF COSMETOLOGIST CATHERINE SNEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Germantown, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | shampoo, moisturizer, intense moisturizer, daily conditioner | ABANDONED | Jan 21, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jones, Hargrove
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ESPECIALLY HAIR A FACIAL FOR THE HAIR THE SIGN ENHANCE AN ALL NATURAL DAILY MOISTURIZER PRODUCTS IN THE SPIRIT OF COSMETOLOGIST CATHERINE SNEED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |