Drawing for 1ST MAIN LINE BANK DIVISION OF NATIONAL PENN BANK

USPTO serial 75108799

1ST MAIN LINE BANK DIVISION OF NATIONAL PENN BANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1ST MAIN LINE BANK DIVISION OF NATIONAL PENN BANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. A. Earley

JOHN F A EARLEY HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1288 VALLEY FORGE RD P O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036commercial banking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 21, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance