USPTO serial 75109181
CHAMPION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2388031Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2000
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHAMPION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dover, DE, US
Winston-Salem, NC, US
Winston-Salem, NC, US
Dover, DE, US
HBI BRANDED APPAREL ENTERPRISES, LLC
WINSTON-SALEM, NC, US
Other trademarks owned by HBI BRANDED APPAREL ENTERPRISES, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren L. Zeserman, Esq.
Warren L. Zeserman, Esq. Hanesbrands Inc.1000 East Hanes Mill Roadc/o Tammy M. Moore - Law DepartmentWinston-Salem, NC 27105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | non-protective and non-safety eyewear, namely, eyeglasses and sunglasses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Saramar Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Champion Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Champion Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Saramar Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by HBI BRANDED APPAREL ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CHAMPION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |