USPTO serial 75109354
WEBMAGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBMAGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-70372 Stuttgart Bad-Cannstadt, DE
D-70372 Stuttgart Bad-Cannstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
FRIEDRICH KEUFFNER342 MADISON AVESTE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of on-line stores, web shops, global information network sites and electronic commerce; sales consulting; product merchandising, namely, offering assistance in sales approach, sales promotion, market research, and advertising; dissemination of advertising materials for others; conducting computer related trade shows; organizing and conducting technology based trade fairs; on-line retailing featuring software, hardware, books, household appliances and industrial appliances | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing interactive shows, movies, games and news via a global computer network; interactive classes and seminars in the fields of business management via a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | mediation of licenses and economic know-how; computer software design for others; computer programming for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |