USPTO serial 75110004
OPTIMUM HYDRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIMUM HYDRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H GELLER
E TWR STE 6002425 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 600SANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin cleansing, moisturizing, conditioning, firming, toning and smoothing preparations, topically applied non-medicated preparations to reduce the appearance of wrinkles and lines in the skin, and preparations to protect the skin from environmental pollutants, wind and sun | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |