Drawing for Serial No. 75111144

USPTO serial 75111144

Serial No. 75111144

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75111144?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Barsky

Daniel J. Barsky Shutts & Bowen LLP200 S. Biscayne BoulevardSuite 4100Miami, FL 33131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry of precious metal; costume jewelryABANDONED—
018saddlery; tote bags; backpacks; briefcases; calling card and key cases; handbags; animal feed bags; and umbrellasABANDONED—
025clothing, namely, tops; bottoms; coats; jackets; ties; belts; head wear; foot wear; swim wear; and sweat pants, shorts and shirtsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance