USPTO serial 75111663
URBATRANS INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR URBAN TRANSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBATRANS INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR URBAN TRANSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M6K 3E3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Silverman
DAVID M SILVERMAN COLE, RAYWID & BRAVERMAN1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | smart cards, credit cards and transportation passes | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | provision of integrated fare collection services; accounting, debit card and bank clearing services; and provision of information regarding transportation routes, schedules and fares via information calling centers and kiosks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |