USPTO serial 75113160
CRYSTAL CHEF'S RECIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRYSTAL CHEF'S RECIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SHOEMAKER AND MATTARE, LTDSTE 1203 CRYSTAL PLZ BLDG 12001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY P O BOX 2286ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | hot sauce, habanero hot sauce, Mexican hot sauce, garlic hot sauce, wing sauce, worcestershire sauce, steak sauce, mustard, soy sauce, barbecue sauce and vinegar with green peppers used as a condiment | ABANDONED | Sep 23, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |