USPTO serial 75113719
WORLD EXPO OF BEER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2000
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WORLD EXPO OF BEER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRANKENMUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Frankenmuth, MI
FRANKENMUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Frankenmuth, MI
FRANKENMUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Frankenmuth, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca L. Wilson
Rebecca L. Wilson The Dobrusin Law Firm, PC29 West Lawrence StreetSuite 210Pontiac, MI 48342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | arranging and conducting entertainment and educational exhibitions, namely, a beer tasting event featuring a variety of substantially domestic beers; educational services, namely, conducting informal classes and seminars in the field of home brewing | ACTIVE | May 17, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKENMUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKENMUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
- Other trademarks owned by FRANKENMUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WORLD EXPO OF BEER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |