Drawing for EFFICIENCY FIRST

USPTO serial 75114017

EFFICIENCY FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFFICIENCY FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori N. Boatright

LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and computer operating programs and applications programs for evaluating, monitoring, managing, controlling, supplying, converting, conditioning and testing energy operations, usage, power quality and energy efficiency within industrial and business environments, and manuals sold as a unit; regulators, switches, monitors, controllers, filters, transformers, circuit breakers, and capacitor banks all for evaluating, monitoring, managing, controlling, supplying, converting, conditioning and testing business and industrial energy operations, usage, power quality and energy efficiencyABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 31, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance