Drawing for GS GAME SOURCE

USPTO serial 75114152

GS GAME SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GS GAME SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARBARA HOFFMAN

BARBARA HOFFMAN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer and video game interactive control floor pads or mats, interactive remote control units, joysticks, machines for use with televisions or computers, software, programs, tape cassettes, tapes, monitors, cartridges, and discs; CD cleaners comprised of cleaning disk and cleaning fluid, sold as a unitABANDONEDJun 27, 1991
028stand alone video game machinesABANDONEDJun 27, 1991
035retail and wholesale hobby, toy and game shopsABANDONEDJun 27, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 21, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 1998PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 6, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance