USPTO serial 75114152
GS GAME SOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GS GAME SOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA HOFFMAN
BARBARA HOFFMAN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and video game interactive control floor pads or mats, interactive remote control units, joysticks, machines for use with televisions or computers, software, programs, tape cassettes, tapes, monitors, cartridges, and discs; CD cleaners comprised of cleaning disk and cleaning fluid, sold as a unit | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1991 |
| 028 | stand alone video game machines | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1991 |
| 035 | retail and wholesale hobby, toy and game shops | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |