USPTO serial 75114456
TCPCONNECT4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TCPCONNECT4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. HOLLAND CAMPBELL
R HOLLAND CAMPBELL LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC600 MTN AVE RM 2E-120MURRAY HILL, NJ 07974-0636UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | house mark for a full line of business networking software, namely, software for use in electronic mail, web, file transfer protocol (FTP), and gopher applications, telnet applications, namely, VT 52, VT 100, VT 101, VT 220, VT 240, VT 320, IBM TN3278g, Tektronix 4010, and Tektronix 4014, electronic news dissemination, file sharing, network file system (NFS) client and server applications, cross-platform printing, line printer routine (LPR) and line printer daemon (LPD) applications and for remote dial-in access | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |