USPTO serial 75114718
CARTOONWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARTOONWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Elgin
JENNIFER L ELGIN THE CARTOON NETWORK LP LLPTURNER ENTERTAINMENT GROUP101 MARIETTA ST NW 19TH FLATLANTA, GA 30303-2774Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | education and entertainment services in the nature of a continuing comedy program series targeted towards children and young adults provided through cable television, broadcast television, broadcast radio and the global computer information network | ACTIVE | May 23, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARTOON NETWORK LP, LLLP, THE,
- Other trademarks owned by Cartoon Network, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Cartoon Network, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CARTOONWORLD
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |