USPTO serial 75114898
LATROBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 1998
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LATROBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Latrobe Brewing Company L.L.C.
Latrobe, PA
ST. LOUIS, MO
Latrobe Brewing Company L.L.C.
Latrobe, PA
NORWALK, CT
ST. LOUIS, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Denver, CO 80201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | alcoholic brewery beverages, namely, beer | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Latrobe Brewing Company L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Latrobe Brewing Company L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by INBEV USA L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by ANHEUSER-BUSCH, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LATROBE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |