Drawing for SMARTCLIENT

USPTO serial 75115292

SMARTCLIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTCLIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Tognino

ALEXANDER TOGNINO IBM CORPN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and computer software and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith for connecting a computer network to a host computer for database managmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 15, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 9, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 16, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 16, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance