Drawing for TIME TUNNEL

USPTO serial 75116033

TIME TUNNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIME TUNNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041CONTINUING SERIES OF SHORT FILLER MATERIAL WITH A DURATION OF ONE MINUTE OR LESS FEATURING HISTORICAL SUBJECTS AND EVENTS TO BE TELECAST ON CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS FEATURING PROGRAMMING RELATING TO HISTORY AND HISTORICAL SUBJECTS AND EVENTSACTIVEJan 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 27, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 11, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 30, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1998REINREINSTATED—
Aug 13, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance