USPTO serial 75116293
ROADTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROADTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3B 3V2, CA
Montreal, Quebec H3B 3V2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARYANN VIRGONA
MARYANN VIRGONA PEARCE & MASSLERCOURT PLZ N25 MAIN STHACKENSACK, NJ 07601-7025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer products, namely, computer hardware, and computer software for use as a browsing resource on global information networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | radio air time brokerage services for use in advertising web sites in a global information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | computer hardware maintenance services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | custom design of computer hardware and software systems for browsing global information networks; designing websites to the specification of others; computer software maintenance services; computer hardware and software consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VDO Road Digital Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VDO Road Digital Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROADTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |