USPTO serial 75116342
OASIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OASIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Posthumus
JOHN R POSTHUMUS HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP1700 LINCOLN ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80203-4541UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | advertising sales management system, comprised of software and firmware, for use by cable systems, cable multiple system operators, cable interconnects, and cable networks to control and manage advertising sales and inventory | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |