USPTO serial 75116941
CLARITEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLARITEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Brody
PETER M BRODY ROPES & GRAY1301 K ST NWSTE 800 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely, telephone handsets and telephone systems comprised of private branch exchange (PBX), hybrid private branch exchange (PBX) and key telephone systems, and software for use therewith, for providing electronic voice and data messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice and data messages by telephone and electronic call distribution | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of telephone systems and equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, local and long-distance telephone calling services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarity Telecom Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarity Telecom Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CLARITEL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |