USPTO serial 75117082
ULTRALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. PHILIP POLSTER
J PHILIP POLSTER POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI, LC763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | fire resistant and fire retardant coatings for exterior and interior surface, made of metal, masonry, ceramic, wood and plastic and not for use on or in connection with automotive or marine vinyl windows | ACTIVE | Dec 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |