USPTO serial 75117328
EZ FLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ FLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Farnham, Quebec, CA
Farnham, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Shlesinger
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | plastic and synthetic resin floor coverings in sheet form | ACTIVE | Jun 3, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |