USPTO serial 75117414
INTRALUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTRALUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Intralux Australia Pty. Limited
Mt. Ommaney, Queensland 4074, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric lighting fixtures, variable position, cable-mounted electric light fixtures; electric lighting systems composed of fluorescent lamps, compact discharge lamps, xenon and halogen incandescent lamps, electronic control gear, optical reflectors, lampholers, aluminum extrusions or plastic injection molded components, sold as a unit and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |