USPTO serial 75117966
VIRGIN MEGAPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRGIN MEGAPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Dabney
JAMES W DABNEY PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, workshops and seminars in the field of cultural, physical, intellectual and spiritual activities and the provision of educational materials distributed therewith; entertainment services, namely, entertainment in the nature of live shows by musical, comedy and theatrical groups; movie theaters; motion picture film production; live performances by musical bands, singers, dancers, mimes, and comedians; stage, screen and television entertainment services, namely, programming and production thereof; organizing and conducting stage shows, namely, theatrical productions, entertainment contests, dances and parties; casino services; provision of recreational facilities; recording studio for sound, films, videos and television; music and book publishing; music concerts; nightclub entertainment services featuring music, dance and comedy performances | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | night club, restaurant, cocktail lounge, cafe and cafeteria services; beauty salons and health and beauty spas; arranging, organizing, and providing general purpose facilities for exhibitions and conferences; aerial and portrait photography services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRGIN MEGAPLEX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |