USPTO serial 75118809
LEAD EXTRACTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEAD EXTRACTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHASHANK UPADHYE
1400 CUMBERLAND AVEUEWEST LAFAYETTE, IN 47906-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical kits comprised of various combinations of one or more of locking stylets, coils, sheaths, catheters, cannulae, tubes, locking wire guides, wire guides, hemostats, clamps, gauge pins, clippers, pin vises, coil expanders, stylet wires, dilators, dilator sheaths and baskets for the percutaneous of transvenous snaring, removal, retrieval or withdrawal of surgical leads | ACTIVE | Apr 11, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |