USPTO serial 75119470
REASSURINGLY EXPENSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REASSURINGLY EXPENSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HELEN H. MINSKER
HELEN H MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF LTD1001 G ST NW FL 11WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4545UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | alcoholic brewery beverages, namely, ale, beer, lager, malt liquor, porter and stout | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |