USPTO serial 75120679
BEWLEY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2554427Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 2002
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEWLEY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dublin 9, IE
Dublin 9, IE
Dublin 9, IE
DUBLIN 17, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne M. Olson
ARNE M OLSON OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 N WACKER DR36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Fish; prepared meals consisting primarily of fish; fruit preserves; fruit jellies; fruit peel; fruit salad; dried fruits; cooked fruits; crystallized fruits; preserved fruits; stewed fruits; fruit-based preserves; jams; jellies for food; vegetable juices for cooking; marmalade; meat; meat extracts; meat jellies; milk; dairy based food beverages; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; processed nuts; poultry; soups; mixes for making soup; vegetable salads; cooked vegetables; dried vegetables; preserved vegetables; yogurt; pate; candied almonds; dairy-based chocolate food beverages; vegetable-based chocolate food beverages; chocolate milk ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Almond paste; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; flavoring syrup for beverages; beverage flavorings, being non-essential oils; ] biscuits; [ bread; ginger bread; bread rolls; buns; cakes; edible decorations for cakes; candy; caramels (candy); breakfast cereals; processed cereals; chicory based coffee substitutes; chocolate; chocolates; chocolate candy; cocoa; cocoa mixes; ] coffee; [ unroasted coffee; coffee flavorings; grain-based and chicory-based coffee substitutes; condiments, namely, catsups, mustards, vinegars, horseradish, mayonnaise, relishes; cookies; ice cream; ice milk; frozen yogurt; flavored ices; farina; food flavorings; flour; fondants (confectionery); fudge (confectionery); crystallized, preserved and powder spice ginger; honey; macaroons; marzipan; meat pies; noodles; nutmegs; pancakes; pasta; candy mints; non-medicated lozenges; pastries; pastry dough; pizzas; candy, caramel, glazed, processed and popped popcorn; pralines; rice; sandwiches; sauces (other than salad dressings); seasonings; sherbets (ices); sorbets (ices); spices; sugar; tarts; pies; ] tea; [ waffles; meat gravies; pudding; salad dressings ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Restaurant, bar and catering services; cafe and cafeteria services; and canteen services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Campbell Bewley Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Campbell Bewley Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Campbell Bewley Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CAMPBELL BEWLEY GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEWLEY'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |